Why are some books not included in the Bible?
· General · Posted by Jeremy Secrest · 0 Comments
06.21.10
Why are some books not included in the Bible?
The Bible is a really a library of 66 books (39 Old Testament and 27 New Testament). It was written over a period of 1,500 years and 40 generations and God used more than 40 different authors from different walks of life. It has hundreds of topics yet it reflects harmony and continuity in the unfolding story of God’s redemption of man. No other book has been so attacked but has survived and thrived. Its existence is the strongest evidence of God’s hand over its development and delivery to us today – it is a miracle in and of itself. But how did it come together to what we know today and why were some books excluded?
Old Testament
The Old Testament that we have today is the same as what the Jewish people recognized in ancient times. However, in the Jewish scripture, the books are ordered differently and are divided into 3 groupings: 1) The Law (Torah or Pentateuch); 2) The Prophets; and 3) The Writings (or sometimes referred to the Psalms after the first book in the grouping). Jewish scripture has Genesis as the first book and the last book as Chronicles.
Many of these books such as the writings of Moses (the Pentateuch or first 5 books of the Bible) were recognized as authoritative from the start as the author was recognized as God’s authority. Other books took more time. The Pentateuch and Prophets were recognized earlier (exact times are disputed) and the Writings took a little longer. However, the Jewish scriptures were essentially set by the 2nd or 3rd century BC such that the Jewish scripture available in New Testament times is the same as what we have today. We could discuss this in a lot more detail, but suffice it to say Jesus and New Testament writers recognized the authority of the Jewish scriptures (our Old Testament). In Luke 24:44, Jesus referred to “the law of Moses, and the Prophets, and the Psalms” and validated the 3 sections of the Jewish scriptures. In Luke 11:51/Matthew 23:35, Jesus said “from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah”. In so doing, Jesus confirms his witness through the extent of the Old Testament. Abel is the first martyr (Gen. 4:8), Zechariah is the last martyr named (2 Chronicles 24:21). Genesis is the first book and Chronicles is the last in the Jewish scripture. Jesus is saying from Genesis to Chronicles. The New Testament writers also made numerous references to the Old Testament as sacred scripture. In short, in holding that the New Testament is inspired, one has to accept the Old Testament.
New Testament
Relative to the New Testament, the formal process of ultimate recognition of our New Testament books was gradual and continuous covering a period of roughly 350 years. However, most of the New Testament was recognized early on by many in general practice. As an example, Clement of Rome wrote to the Christians in Corinth around AD 95 and referenced various New Testament books such as Matthew, Luke, Hebrews, Romans, Corinthians, I Timothy, Titus, I Peter, and Ephesians. The apostles’ writings became widely read in public meetings by the middle of the 2nd century. In the last half of the 2nd century we see lists of New Testament books and these books held a place along side of the Old Testament as “scripture”. They were even made subject of commentaries. The 3rd century saw the collecting of books into a “New Testament” including the sifting process that separated them from other writings. In the 4th century, conclusions were made about the New Testament canon indicating formal acceptance by the whole church. Ultimately, the Synod of Hippo (AD 393) formerly listed the 27 books of the New Testament, but it did not confer authority that the books did not already long before possess.
Why Other Books Are Excluded
The deaths of the apostles elevated the importance of their writings and the need to preserve what the apostles had reported. Our early Church fathers were uniquely positioned to validate the authenticity of scripture and did a tremendous service for us today in identifying those writings that carried the divine authority. They knew the truth of the gospel and recognized writings that were consistent with that truth and which could be validated as to apostolic authorship. Before any formal councils, the early church leaders evaluated whether the writings of their day carried the authority of the apostles.
The early church fathers rejected other writings that were either inconsistent with the gospel truth or were of questionable authorship. Post first century, there was an increasing circulation of books on Jesus that were not in accordance with the apostles’ teaching (heretical) and/or were not written by an apostle even though one of the apostles’ names was ascribed to the work (pseudonymous). The early Christians became increasingly concerned about identifying authentic works of the apostles or those entrusted with their teaching (i.e., Mark for Peter, Luke for Paul). These early church leaders were not uncritical or naïve. They were alert to false writings after warnings by Jesus, Paul and other apostles to be wary of false teachers (1 John 4:1).
There have been recent finds of other ancient texts such as the Nag Hammadi texts in 1945 or the Judas and Mary Magdalene “gospels”. These ancient writings are essentially inconsistent with New Testament doctrine. Many deny the divinity of Jesus and/or his physical resurrection – truths that are fundamental to New Testament doctrine. Others contain nonsensical or fanciful stories. As they proclaim ideas outside of the scope of New Testament doctrine and/or their authorship could not be collaborated, they were not considered for inclusion in the New Testament canon. In other words, under a standard of truth, these writings and that of the New Testament are mutually exclusive. If one is true, the other cannot be true.
At this time, Biblical Scripture is closed with no opening for other books for inclusion. Through out this miracle of the compilation of God’s Word, God’s hand has guided the process. Ultimately, the books we have are what He has intended.
